What I think about the news is that they are not terrorisms.
To put it simply, passengers flying were delayed across different
U.S. airports including JFK airport on October. According to this article, a
glitch of customs computers led to outrages at several U.S. airports, causing
traveler lines and problems. The glitch affected computers used to screen for
terror suspects. More than 400 flights were reported to have been delayed
because of the incident.
This raised fears that the system had been hacked. However, the
department of Homeland Security stated that there was no evidence for this.
What truly caused the glitch has not yet been identified.
So, did the airport management handle the glitch well? I think that
the answer is no. Actually, the airport management couldn’t handle the glitch
well.
There is the criticism, “People wondered why the staff did not do
manual checks instead of stopping operations”. But I guess that labor-intensive
method has its limits since there isn’t always excess manpower in every
company. I guess that half manual checks cause second accident. However, it
goes without saying that the training for the employees might be needed to deal
with every unpredictable contingency.
However, not only the airport management but also other business
managements depend on computer systems and can’t take perfect measures in
preparation for all those kinds of incidents. I think that the best way to be
done is developing an alternative computer system which can work at the same time.
But it is very expensive and it will be reflected in airfare or airport fee.
Maybe, computer system like this is supposed to have an alternative system.
This time around, at least, they might not have such a system to screen terror
suspect.
While all the world has been working on strengthening security
systems against terrorism lately, Japan’s organization related must check
security systems including computer systems. And also, in case that a glitch occurs
suddenly, authorities should prepare multiple measures to be taken , regardless of whether they are owned by publicly or privately.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿